Mutual Wills: Where ther’s a will there’s a way – or is there?

Mutual Wills: Where ther’s a will there’s a way – or is there?

Author: Edward Bragiel (2002)

In recent years the court has examined on several occasions the agreements that give rise to
mutual wills. Edward Bragiel looks at Healey v Brown and asks if the court reached the
right result. If it did, there is a significant new pitfall in the preparation of such wills
(taken from Issue No 21  – October 2002

Introduction
The term `mutual wills` is properly used to describe the situation where two people (T1 and T2) make a binding agreement whereby each undertakes to make their last will in the same form leaving property to particular beneficiaries. The most common situation is where T1 and T2 agree to make wills leaving their property to the other, if the other survives, and in default o a beneficiary (B) but it is not essential that the surviving testator (T2) should receive property under the will of the first testator to die (T1)1. If T1 dies without having altered or revoked his will he has performed his part of the bargain and this creates an obligation on the part of T2 that he too will adhere to the agreement.

Trust Quarterly Review

Trust Quarterly Review

The Trust Quarterly Review is published in partnership with STEP, it discusses matters of interest to trustees and executors with a focus on the particular interests of trust corporations in mind

TACT members

Upcoming TACT meetings and events

Upcoming TACT meetings and events

Talk to TACT

For more information fill out the form below or contact Scott Clayton on
020 3576 3516 or email scott.clayton@tactweb.org.

  By submitting your details, you consent to their use as set out in our Privacy Policy.